The result is the dilemma that British constitutional rights defenders are familiar with and which has been the subject of much discussion during the UK`s lifetime membership of the EU. If a British court were to implement substantial law provisions of national law which, in turn, clearly and, admittedly, violates the OBLIGATIONs of the United Kingdom and that they acquire internal legal effects through legislation guaranteeing the orderly withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the EU, or should a court make these provisions incompatible with the withdrawal agreement and not by legal arrangements incompatible with the Do Not Take It Back Agreement? The fly in the ointment, however, is included in Section 38 of the 2020 Act. The so-called « sovereignty » clause requires that paragraphs 7A-7C be read as if they did not depart from the sovereignty of Parliament. This could have been a source of concern for the EU, but it has always been true that all the legislation transposing the withdrawal agreement was contrary to the principle of Parliament`s sovereignty and that the law had not, in itself, complied with Article 4, provided that the agreement could be applied in practice and that inconsistent provisions could not be applied. The United Kingdom ensures that all specific obligations arising from Community agreements with third countries or international organisations concerning nuclear equipment, nuclear materials or other nuclear elements present in the United Kingdom at the end of the transition period are fulfilled, or to conclude, by other means, appropriate arrangements in agreement with the third country or an international organisation concerned. CONSIDERING that sovereign base lands should remain part of the EU`s customs territory after the UK`s withdrawal from the EU; 4. Notwithstanding paragraph 3, the United Kingdom may negotiate, sign and ratify international agreements in its own areas of jurisdiction during the transitional period, provided that these agreements do not enter into force or apply during the transitional period, unless: , the Union approves it. REMEMBERing the agreements reached on 29 November 2018 between the Kingdom of Spain and the United Kingdom on citizens` rights, tobacco and other products, environmental cooperation and police and customs cooperation, as well as the agreement reached on 29 November 2018 on the conclusion of an agreement on taxation and the protection of financial interests, Article 26 , as introduced in December, was different from the October 2019 version of the WAB. The new subsection 26 (1) amends Section 6 of the EU Withdrawal Act in 2018. Government ministers could decide, by regulation, when, when and how the UK`s leading courts should depart from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) after the transition or transposition period (with regard to the interpretation of UNION law). This provision was criticized because it was not known how this power would be used and how it would affect the internal hierarchy of the British courts. CONSIDERING that it is necessary to guarantee an orderly exit from the Eu with regard to Gibraltar, the Union invites, on an exceptional basis, the United Kingdom to participate, within the framework of the EU delegation, in meetings or at certain parts of the meetings of these institutions when the Union considers that the presence of the United Kingdom is necessary and in the interests of the Union, in particular for the effective implementation of these agreements , is carried out; this presence is only permitted if the participation of Member States is authorised by the existing agreements.